Why 165mm Cranks Works for Tadej Pogačar
Tadej Pogačar’s use of 165mm cranks reflects a modern, data-driven approach. He favors efficiency, aerodynamics, and versatility over traditional leverage-based thinking. It’s a nod to his smaller frame and explosive style, letting him spin like a track cyclist while still crushing climbs. His success (e.g., 2024’s 6 Giro stages, 5 Tour stages) proves this isn’t a gimmick – it’s a calculated edge. Teams like UAE likely tested this via power meter data and wind tunnel sessions, confirming it maximizes his watts and minimizes drag.
Compared to the typical 172.5mm crank, 165mm cranks shifts the narrative: Pogačar’s performance isn’t about muscling through with longer cranks but out spinning and outlasting rivals with a shorter, snappier setup. It’s a testament to his adaptability – making a “non-standard” choice work across Grand Tours, TTs, and Classics.
1. Climbing Dominance
Pogačar’s climbing prowess – think his 2024 Giro d’Italia demolitions or 2021 Tour de France Mont Ventoux stage – relies on high power (6.5-7 W/kg) and a cadence often around 90-100 RPM. With a 165mm crank, he’s trading some torque (shorter lever arm) for faster leg turnover. This suggests his climbing strength comes less from grinding big gears and more from spinning efficiently at higher RPMs, leveraging his aerobic engine and anaerobic snap. The shorter cranks reduce the range of motion at his hips and knees, minimizing fatigue over long climbs or multi-stage efforts – key to his Grand Tour stamina. His explosive attacks (e.g., dropping Roglič on La Planche des Belles Filles in 2020) align with this, as 165mm cranks enhance quick cadence shifts without bogging down his legs.
This choice might slightly limit raw torque on ultra-steep gradients (15%+), but his ability to sustain 420W+ on climbs like Oropa shows his leg strength and conditioning compensate. He’s effectively optimized for sustained high output over pure leverage – a modern climbing style.
2. Time Trial Prowess
In time trials – like his 2020 Tour de France TT win – 165mm cranks are a game-changer. The shorter length allows a tighter hip angle at the top of the pedal stroke, letting him tuck lower into an aero position. This reduces frontal area and drag, potentially saving 10-20 watts over 30-40 minutes, critical in his 57-second reversal against Roglič. The smaller pedal circle also suits his ability to hold 90-100 RPM at 400-450W. This makes his power delivery smoother and less taxing on his joints. For a TT with climbs (e.g., La Planche), 165mm cranks sacrifice some gear-pushing grunt, but his lightweight frame (66-68 kg) and elite power-to-weight ratio offset this. It’s a brilliant choice for a versatile TT rider who prioritizes aero gains and efficiency.
3. Versatility in Classics
In punchy Classics like Strade Bianche or Il Lombardia, 165mm cranks amplify Pogačar’s agility. The shorter length supports rapid cadence spikes (100+ RPM) on short, steep pitches – like the Poggio or Sormano – letting him accelerate out of corners or bridge gaps with less effort. His 2023 Flanders performance (staying with sprinters like Van der Poel) underscores this: 165mm cranks enhance leg speed for flat-out chases or recovery between efforts. While he might lose a touch of torque on longer climbs compared to 170-175mm cranks, his anaerobic capacity and tactical acumen make up for it. This setup leans into his dynamic, attack-oriented style over raw grinding power.
4. Biomechanics and Fit
At 176 cm with a ~31-32-inch inseam, 165mm cranks are shorter than the typical 170-172.5mm range for his size (18-20% of inseam rule). This suggests a deliberate choice, likely driven by bike fitting data or preference for a compact pedaling style. The reduced joint range (less hip/knee flexion) suits his smooth, fluid motion – rarely showing strain even after 6-hour stages. It aligns with his smaller stature relative to taller climbers (e.g., Froome at 186 cm). It also minimizes over-extension risks and boosts comfort. His injury-free career supports this fit, though it’s bold for a rider who doesn’t “need” such short cranks based on height alone.
5. Trade-Offs and Strengths of 165mm Cranks
· Strengths Amplified: 165mm cranks enhance Pogačar’s high-cadence efficiency, aero positioning, and fatigue resistance. His ability to spin up quickly and recover between efforts (e.g., 2024 Giro-Tour double) shines through this setup. It’s ideal for his hybrid style – blending climber’s endurance with a puncheur’s snap.
· Trade-Offs: He sacrifices some torque, which might show on low-cadence, big-gear efforts (e.g., grinding a 53×11 at 70 RPM). Yet, his dominance on varied terrain suggests his training and power (1000W+ sprints, 420W+ climbs) override this. The shorter lever arm could theoretically limit peak force, but his results laugh that off.
Are 165mm Cranks For You?
If you’re inspired by Pogačar, 165mm cranks could boost your cadence and aero game, especially if you’re 5’10” or under and prioritize versatility. Test it against your current setup – watch for power gains at 90-100 RPM and comfort on long rides.
Frequently Asked Questions
165mm cranks can enhance bike racing performance for certain riders, particularly those with shorter inseams or those prioritizing high cadence. Shorter cranks allow faster pedal strokes, reducing muscle fatigue in high-RPM efforts like criteriums or track racing. For road racing, 165mm cranks improve cornering clearance on steep descents or tight turns, minimizing pedal strikes. However, they may slightly reduce leverage compared to standard 170–175mm cranks, potentially affecting raw power output in sprints or climbs. Racers under 5’6” or those with a high-cadence style (e.g., 100+ RPM) often benefit most. Test 165mm cranks in training to ensure they suit your race discipline and biomechanics.
In bike racing, proper fit is critical, and 165mm cranks can optimize fit for specific riders. Shorter cranks reduce the hip and knee flexion required at the top of the pedal stroke. This improves comfort and reduces injury risk for racers with limited hip mobility or shorter legs. This also allows a lower saddle height, lowering the center of gravity for better handling in technical races like cyclocross or criteriums. For bike fit, a professional fitting is recommended. When switching to 165mm cranks, as saddle height and fore-aft position may need adjustment (typically 5–10mm higher saddle for every 5mm shorter crank). This ensures power transfer and aerodynamics remain optimized for road, track, or gravel racing.
165mm cranks are ideal for bike racers with shorter statures (under 5’6”), those with high-cadence pedaling styles, or racers in disciplines requiring tight cornering or high ground clearance. In track racing, shorter cranks suit sprinters spinning at 120+ RPM. In cyclocross or gravel racing, they reduce pedal strikes on uneven terrain. Junior racers or women with smaller frames often find 165mm cranks improve fit and efficiency. However, taller or power-focused racers (e.g., sprinters in road races) may prefer 170–175mm cranks for greater torque. Consult a bike fitter to confirm if 165mm cranks match your body and race goals.
In road racing and gravel racing, 165mm cranks offer distinct advantages and trade-offs.
– Pros: They enable higher cadences (ideal for sustained efforts in road races or criteriums), improve cornering clearance (key for gravel or technical descents), and reduce strain on hips and knees, aiding recovery in multi-stage races.
– Cons: Reduced leverage can limit max power for sprints or steep climbs, potentially impacting road race breakaways or gravel punchy sections. They may also feel less natural for riders accustomed to longer cranks, requiring adaptation. For gravel racing, 165mm cranks pair well with wider tires (e.g., 35–40mm) for technical courses. Test them on race-like terrain to weigh performance impacts.
Comparing 165mm cranks to 170mm or 175mm cranks in bike racing hinges on rider size, discipline, and goals. 165mm cranks promote higher cadences (100–120 RPM), ideal for track, criterium, or cyclocross racers needing quick spin-ups. They also offer better pedal clearance for technical gravel or road courses. Conversely, 170–175mm cranks provide more leverage. This benefits sprinters or climbers in road races who rely on lower cadences (80–90 RPM) for power. Taller racers (over 5’10”) often find longer cranks more comfortable. But, switching to 165mm may require 2-4 weeks of adaptation and bike fit tweaks. Data from power meters can help compare wattage output across crank lengths for your racing style.